Ladies and gentlemen,
you are about to hear a very frightening speech.
This speech is an explanation of the plans
now being laid to throw the United States into a third world war.
It was made a short time ago before a large group in the Congressional Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.
Both, the speech and the question and answer period later so electrified the audience
that a group of patriots has transferred it to two long-playing records
which you may buy to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in your community.
The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman,
noted authority on Zionism and all of its schemes.
Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew.
He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail,
and stands today as a leading American patriot.
We now take you to the speaker's platform to present Benjamin Freedman.
What I intend to tell you tonight
is something that you have never been able to learn from any other source,
and what I tell you now concerns not only you,
but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity.
I'm not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure,
but I'm here to tell you things
that will help you preserve what you consider the most sacred things in the world:
the liberty, and the freedom, and the right to live as Christians,
where you have a little dignity,
and a little right to pursue the things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as Christians.
Now, first of all,
I'd like to tell you that on August 25th 1960
- that was shortly before elections - Senator Kennedy,
who is now the President of the United States,
went to New York,
and delivered an address to the Zionist Organization of America.
In that address,
to reduce it to its briefest form,
he stated that he would use the armed forces of the United States
to preserve the existence of the regime
set up in Palestine by the Zionists
who are now in occupation of that area.
In other words,
Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes,
away from their families,
and sent abroad to fight in Palestine against the Christian and Moslem Arabs
who merely want to return to their homes.
And these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent [Arab Palestinians] people
who only want to follow out fifteen resolutions passed by the United Nations in the last twelve years
calling upon the Zionists to allow these people to return to their homes.
Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East
to fight with the Zionists as their allies
to prevent the return of these people
who were evicted from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists
who were transplanted there from Eastern Europe...
when that happens,
the United States will trigger World War III.
when will that take place?
The answer is,
as soon as the difficulty between France and Algeria has been settled,
that will take place.
As soon as France and Algeria have settled their difficulty,
and the Arab world, or the Moslem world,
has no more war on their hands with France,
they are going to move these people back into their homes,
and when they do that
and President Kennedy sends your sons to fight over there
to help the crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent men,
women and children, we will trigger World War III;
and when that starts
you can be sure we cannot emerge from that war a victor.
We are going to lose that war
because there is not one nation in the world
that will let one of their sons fight with us for such a cause.
I know and speak to these ambassadors in Washington
and the United Nations
- and of the ninety-nine nations there,
I've consulted with maybe seventy of them
- and when we go to war in Palestine
to help the thieves retain possession of what they have stolen from these innocent people
we're not going to have a man there to fight with us as our ally.
And who will these people have supporting them, you ask.
Well, four days after President Kennedy
- or he was then Senator Kennedy
- made that statement on August 28, 1960,
the Arab nations called a meeting in Lebanon
and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate,
the government of Palestine,
which has been dormant more or less,
since the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists.
Not only that...
they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army,
and they are now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area of the world
to lead these people back to their homeland.
they have as their allies
all the nations of what is termed the Bandung Conference Group.
That includes the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union satellite.
It includes Red China;
it includes every independent country in Asia and Africa;
or eighty percent of the world's total population.
Eighty percent of the world's population.
Four out of five human beings on the face of the earth
will be our enemies at war with us.
And not alone are they
four out of five human beings now on the face of this earth,
but they are the non-Christian population of the world
and they are the non-Caucasians...
the non-white nations of the world,
and that's what we face.
And what is the reason?
The reason is that here
in the United States,
the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government.
For many reasons
too many and too complex to go into here at this time
I'll be glad to answer questions, however,
to support that statement
- the Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States
as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.
Now, you say, 'well, that's a very broad statement to make',
but let me show what happened while you were
- I don't want to wear that out
- let me show what happened while we were all asleep.
I'm including myself with you.
We were all asleep.
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914.
Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year
in which World War One broke out.
There are few people here
my age who remember that.
Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain,
France, and Russia;
and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.
Within two years Germany had won that war:
not alone won it nominally, but won it actually.
The German submarines,
which were a surprise to the world,
had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean,
and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers,
stood there with one week's food supply facing her
- and after that, starvation.
At that time, the French army had mutinied.
They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth
in the defense of Verdun on the Somme.
The Russian army was defecting.
They were picking up their toys and going home,
they didn't want to play war anymore,
they didn't like the Czar.
And the Italian army had collapsed.
- not a shot had been fired on the German soil.
Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany.
And yet, here was Germany
offering England peace terms.
They offered England a negotiated peace
on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis.
That means: Let's call the war off,
and let everything be as it was before the war started.
in the summer of 1916 was considering that.
They had no choice.
It was either accepting this negotiated peace
that Germany was magnanimously offering them,
or going on with the war
and being totally defeated.
While that was going on,
the Zionists in Germany,
who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe,
went to the British War Cabinet and - I am going to be brief
because this is a long story,
but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make
if anyone here is curious,
or doesn't believe what I'm saying
is at all possible
- the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet
and they said:
You can yet win this war.
You don't have to give up.
You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany.
You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.
The United States was not in the war at that time.
We were fresh;
we were young;
we were rich;
we were powerful.
[Zionists] told England:
"We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally,
to fight with you on your side,
if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war."
In other words,
they made this deal:
"We will get the United States into this war as your ally.
The price you must pay us is Palestine
after you have won the war and defeated Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Turkey."
England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody,
as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland
for any reason whatsoever.
It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain
- that never had any connection or any interest
or any right in what is known as Palestine
- should offer it as coin of the realm
to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.
they made that promise,
in October of 1916.
October, nineteen hundred and sixteen.
And shortly after that
- I don't know how many here remember it
- the United States,
which was almost totally pro-German
- because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews,
the bankers were Jews,
all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews,
and they were pro-German
because their people,
in the majority of cases
came from Germany,
and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.
The Jews didn't like the Czar,
and they didn't want Russia to win this war.
So the German bankers
- the German-Jews
Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States
refused to finance France or England
to the extent of one dollar.
They stood aside and they said:
"As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!"
But they poured money into Germany,
they fought with Germany against Russia,
trying to lick the Czarist regime.
those same Jews,
when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine,
they went to England
and they made this deal.
At that time, everything changed,
like the traffic light
that changes from red to green.
Where the newspapers had been all pro-German,
where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having
fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects,
all of a sudden
the Germans were no good.
They were villains.
They were Huns.
They were shooting Red Cross nurses.
They were cutting off babies' hands.
And they were no good.
Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States,
to Justice Brandeis:
"Go to work on President Wilson.
We're getting from England what we want.
Now you go to work,
and you go to work on President Wilson
and get the United States into the war."
And that did happen.
That's how the United States got into the war.
We had no more interest in it;
we had no more right to be in it
than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.
- World War One
- in which the United States participated
had absolutely no reason to be our war.
We went in there
- we were railroaded into it
- if I can be vulgar,
we were suckered into - that war
merely so that the Zionists of the world
could obtain Palestine.
Now, that is something
that the people in the United States have never been told.
They never knew why we went into World War One.
Now, what happened?
After we got into the war,
the Zionists went to Great Britain
and they said:
"Well, we performed our part of the agreement.
Let's have something in writing
that shows that you are going to keep your bargain
and give us Palestine after you win the war."
Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year
or another ten years.
So they started to work out a receipt.
The receipt took the form of a letter,
and it was worded in very cryptic language
so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about.
And that was called
the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise
to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon
as a consideration for getting the United States into the war.
So this great Balfour Declaration,
that you hear so much about,
is just as phony as a three dollar bill.
And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.
Now, that is where all the trouble started.
The United States went in the war.
The United States crushed Germany.
We went in there, and it's history.
You know what happened.
Now, when the war was ended,
and the Germans went to Paris,
to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919,
there were 117 Jews there,
as a delegation representing the Jews,
headed by Bernard Baruch.
I was there:
I ought to know. Now what happened?
The Jews at that peace conference,
when they were cutting up Germany
and parceling out Europe
to all these nations
that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory,
the Jews said,
"How about Palestine for us?"
And they produced,
for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans,
this Balfour Declaration.
So the Germans, for the first time realized,
"Oh, that was the game!
That's why the United States came into the war."
And the Germans for the first time realized
that they were defeated,
they suffered this terrific reparation
that was slapped onto them,
because the Zionists wanted Palestine
and they were determined to get it at any cost.
Now, that brings us to another very interesting point.
When the Germans realized this,
they naturally resented it.
Up to that time,
the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world
than they had been in Germany.
You had Mr. Rathenau there,
who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance
as is Bernard Baruch in this country.
You had Mr. Balin,
who owned the two big steamship lines,
the North German Lloyd's
and the Hamburg-American Lines.
You had Mr. Bleichroder,
who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family.
You had the Warburgs in Hamburg,
who were the big merchant bankers
- the biggest in the world.
The Jews were doing very well in Germany.
No question about that.
Now, the Germans felt:
"Well, that was quite a sellout."
It was a sellout that I can best compare
- suppose the United States was at war today with the Soviet Union.
And we were winning.
And we told the Soviet Union:
"Well, let's quit.
We offer you peace terms.
Let's forget the whole thing."
And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union.
And throwing them into the war
brought about our defeat.
A crushing defeat,
with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat,
if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country,
our Chinese citizens,
who all the time we thought they were loyal citizens
working with us,
were selling us out to the Soviet Union
and that it was through them
that Red China was brought into the war against us.
How would we feel,
in the United States against Chinese?
I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street.
There wouldn't be lampposts enough, convenient,
to take care of them.
Imagine how we would feel.
that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews.
"We've been so nice to them";
and from 1905 on,
when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed,
and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia,
they all went to Germany.
And Germany gave them refuge.
And they were treated very nicely.
And here they sold Germany down the river
for no reason at all
other than they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."
Now, Nahum Sokolow - all the great leaders,
the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today
- they, in 1919, 1920, '21, '22, and '23,
they wrote in all their papers
- and the press was filled with their statements
- that "the feeling against the Jews in Germany
is due to the fact that they realized
that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession
and bringing the United States into the war against them."
The Jews themselves admitted that.
It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood
tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer.
There was no religious feeling.
There was no sentiment against those people
merely on account of their religious belief.
It was all political.
It was economic.
It was anything but religious.
Nobody cared in Germany
whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said
or "Our Father."
No one cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States.
this feeling that developed later in Germany
was due to one thing:
that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat,
for no reason at all,
because World War One was started against Germany for no reason
for which they [Germans] were responsible.
They were guilty of nothing.
Only of being successful.
They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.
You must remember, Germany,
at the time of Napoleon,
at the time of the French Revolution,
what was the German Reich
consisted of 300 - three hundred! - small city-states,
principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.
Three hundred little separate political entities.
And between that time, between the period of...
between Napoleon and Bismarck,
they were consolidated into one state.
And within 50 years after that time
they became one of the world's great powers.
Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's,
they were doing business all over the world,
they could undersell anybody
and make better products.
And what happened?
What happenedas a result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia
"We must slap down Germany",
because there isn't one historian in the world
that can find a valid reason
why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.
Now, what happened after that?
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat,
they naturally resented it.
But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed.
Not a single hair.
Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University,
who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department,
wrote in his book,
and quoted from a State Department document
written by Hugo Schoenfelt,
who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners.
And he wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.
They were in excellent shape;
everybody treated well.
And they were filled with Communists.
Well, a lot of them were Jews,
because the Jews happened to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time.
And there were some priests there,
and ministers, and labor leaders,
Masons, and others who had international affiliations.
Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact.
They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany,
and that the Germans resented that.
So they did take appropriate action against them [against the Jews].
They... shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could?
They shunned them.
The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes,
or the Catholics,
or anyone in this country
who had sold us out to an enemy
and brought about our defeat.
Now, after a while,
the Jews of the world didn't know what to do,
so they called a meeting in Amsterdam.
Jews from every country in the world attended in July 1933.
And they said to Germany:
"You fire Hitler!
And you put every Jew back into his former position,
whether he was a Communist, no matter what he was.
You can't treat us that way!
And we, the Jews of the world,
are calling upon you,
and serving this ultimatum upon you."
Well, the Germans told them... you can imagine.
So what did they [the Jews] do?
They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer,
if the name means anything to people here...
(You want to ask a question?
-- Uh, there were no Communists in Germany at that time.
they were called 'Social Democrats.)
Well, I don't want to go by what they were called.
We're now using English words,
and what they were called in Germany is not very material...
but they were Communists, because in 1917,
the Communists took over Germany for a few days.
Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht,
and a group of Jews in Germany took over the government for three days.
In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war,
he fled to Holland
because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany
as they did Russia,
and that he was going to meet the same fate that the Czar did in Russia.
So he left and went to Holland for safety and for security.
Now, at that time,
when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed,
it was quiet,
the Jews were working,
still trying to get back into their former
- their status
- and the Germans fought them in every way they could,
without hurting a hair on anyone's head.
The same as one group, the Prohibitionists,
fought the people who were interested in liquor,
and they didn't fight one another with pistols,
they did it every way they could.
Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany.
And, at that time, mind you,
there were 80 to 90 million Germans
and there were only 460,000 Jews...
less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews.
And yet, they controlled all of the press,
they controlled most of the economy,
because they had come in and with cheap money
- you know the way the Mark was devalued
- they bought up practically everything.
Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender,
to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam,
they broke up
and Mr. Untermeyer came back to the United States
- who was the head of the American delegation
and the president of the whole conference
- and he went from the steamer to ABC
and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said:
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany.
We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans.
And we are going to starve them into surrender.
We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them,
that will destroy them
because they are dependent upon their export business."
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported,
and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported.
So if Germany could not export,
two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve.
There just was not enough food for more than one third of the population.
in this declaration, which I have here,
it was printed on page
- a whole page
- in the New York Times on August 7, 1933,
Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that:
"this economic boycott is our means of self-defense.
President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA".
[National Recovery Administration] - which some of you may remember,
where everybody was to be boycotted
unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal,
which of course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time.
the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany,
and it was so effective
that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world
with the words "made in Germany" on it.
an executive of the Woolworth Company told me
that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river;
that their stores were boycotted.
If anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany,"
they were picketed with signs:
"Hitler", "murderer", and so forth, and like
- something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.
which is controlled by a family called Strauss
who also happen to be Jews...
a woman found stockings there
which came from Chemnitz,
marked "made in Germany".
Well, they were cotton stockings.
They may have been there 20 years,
because since I've been observing women's legs in the last twenty years,
I haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them.
I saw Macy boycotted,
with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying
"MURDERS" and "HITLERITES", and so forth.
up to that time,
not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany.
There was no suffering,
there was no starvation,
there was no murder,
there was nothing.
Now, that... naturally, the Germans said,
"Why, who are these people to declare a boycott against us
and throw all our people out of work,
and our industries come to a standstill?
Who are they to do that to us?"
They naturally resented it.
Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.
Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper
who was part of a boycott
who was going to starve Germany into surrender into the Jews of the world,
who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be?
Well, it was ridiculous.
That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938,
when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris
and shot one of the officials [a German official]
that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany.
And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.
Now, for anyone to say that
- I don't like to use the word 'anti-Semitism'
because it's meaningless,
but it means something to you still,
so I'll have to use it
- the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews
was that they were responsible:
number one, for World War One;
number two, for this world-wide boycott,
and number three - did I say for World War One,
they were responsible?
For the boycott - and also for World War II,
because after this thing got out of hand,
it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany
to lock horns in a war
to see which one was going to survive.
In the meanwhile,
I had lived in Germany,
and I knew that the Germans had decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian or Communist:
there is no in between.
It's going to be Christian or it's going to be Communist.
And the Germans decided:
"We're going to keep it Christian if possible".
And they started to re-arm.
And there intention was
- by that time the United States had recognized the Soviet Union,
which they did in November, 1933
- the Soviet Union was becoming very powerful,
and Germany realized:
"Well, our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong."
The same as we in this country are saying today,
"Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong."
And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for defense,
Defense against whom?
Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow
that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways,
took over control of many other governments of the world.
for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War,
from which we cannot emerge a victor,
is something that staggers my imagination.
I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons.
A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT.
One million tons of TNT is a megaton.
Now, our nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10 megatons,
or 10 million tons of TNT.
That was when they were first developed five or six years ago.
Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons,
and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
So, what do we face now?
If we trigger a world war
that may develop into a nuclear war,
humanity is finished.
And why will it take place?
It will take place because Act III...
the curtain goes up on Act III.
Act I was World War I.
Act II was World War II.
Act III is going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world,
the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere,
are determined that they are going to again use the United States
to help them permanently retain Palestine
as their foothold for their world government.
Now, that is just as true as I am standing here,
because not alone have I read it,
but many here have read it,
and it's known all over the world.
what are we going to do?
The life you save may be your son's.
Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight;
and you don't know it any more
than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet
to send your sons to war in Europe.
Did you know it at that time?
Not a person in the United States knew it.
You weren't permitted to know it.
Who knew it?
President Wilson knew it.
Colonel House knew it.
Others knew it.
Did I know it?
I had a pretty good idea of what was going on:
I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr.,
in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected,
and there was talk around the office there.
I was 'confidential man' to Henry Morgenthau, Sr.,
who was chairman of the Finance Committee,
and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells,
So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table,
and all the others,
and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain
the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve,
and also indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand,
and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent
when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby.
And that's how they got us into World War I,
while we all slept.
Now, at this moment...
at this moment they may be planning this World War III,
in which we don't stand a chance
even if they don't use nuclear bombs.
How can the United States
- about five percent of the world
- go out and fight eighty to ninety percent of the world on their home ground?
How can we do it...
send our boys over there to be slaughtered?
So the Jews can have Palestine as their 'commonwealth'?
They've fooled you so much
that you don't know whether you're coming or going.
Now any judge,
when he charges a jury, says,
"Gentlemen, any witness that you find has told a single lie,
you can disregard all his testimony."
That is correct.
I don't know from what state you come,
but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury.
If that witness said one lie,
disregard his testimony.
Now, what are the facts about the Jews?
- I call them Jews to you,
because they are known as Jews.
I don't call them Jews.
I refer to them as so-called Jews,
because I know what they are.
If Jesus was a Jew,
there isn't a Jew in the world today,
and if those people are Jews,
certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them,
and I can prove that.
Now what happened?
The eastern European Jews,
who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people
who call themselves Jews,
were originally Khazars.
They were a warlike tribe
that lived deep in the heart of Asia.
And they were so warlike
that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe
- and to reduce this
so you don't get too confused about the history of Eastern Europe
- they set up this big Khazar kingdom:
800,000 square miles.
Only, there was no Russia,
there were no other countries,
and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe
- so big and so powerful
that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war,
the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.
That's how big and powerful they were.
Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy.
I don't want to go into the details of that now.
It was their religion
the way it was the religion of many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world.
the [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom
that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith
- either Christianity, Islam
- the Moslem faith
- or what is known today as Judaism
- really Talmudism.
So, like spinning a top and calling out "eeny, meeny,
he picked out so-called Judaism.
And that became the state religion.
He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura
and brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings,
and opened up synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people
- 800,000 thousand square miles
- and maybe ten to twenty million people;
and they became what we call Jews.
There wasn't one of them that had an ancestor
that ever put a toe in the Holy Land,
not only in Old Testament history,
but back to the beginning of time.
Not one of them!
they come to the Christians
and they ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by saying:
you want to certainly help repatriate God's chosen people to their Promised Land,
their ancestral homeland.
It's your Christian duty.
We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior.
You now go to church on Sunday,
and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."
they were pagan Khazars
who were converted just the same as the Irish [were converted].
And it's just as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land,"
as it would be... there are 54 million Chinese Moslems.
Fifty four million!
And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time,
54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.
2,000 miles away from Arabia,
where the city of Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born...
imagine if the 54 million Chinese called themselves 'Arabs'.
Why, you'd say they're lunatics.
Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs
must be crazy.
All they did was adopt as a religious faith;
a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia.
The same as the Irish.
When the Irish became Christians,
nobody dumped them in the ocean
and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants
that were Christians.
They weren't different people.
They were the same people,
but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith.
Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns...
they were a Mongoloid race
who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe.
likewise, because their king took the faith
- Talmudic faith
- they had no choice.
Just the same as in Spain:
If the king was Catholic,
everybody had to be a Catholic.
you had to get out of Spain.
- they lived on the land just like the trees and the bushes;
a human being belonged to the land under their feudal system
- so they
all became what we call today, Jews!
imagine how silly it was for the Christians...
for the great Christian countries of the world to say,
"We're going to use our power,
to repatriate God's chosen people
to their ancestral homeland,
their Promised Land."
Now, could there be a bigger lie than that?
And because they control the newspapers, the magazines,
the radio, the television, the book publishing business,
they have the ministers in the pulpit,
they have the politicians on the soap boxes
talking the same language ...
you'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough.
You wouldn't call black black anymore
- you'd start to call black white.
And nobody could blame you.
Now, that is one of the great lies...
that is the foundation of all the misery
that has befallen the world.
Because after two wars fought in Europe
- World War I and World War II
- if it wasn't possible for them to live in peace and harmony with the people in Europe,
like their brethren are living in the United States,
what were the two wars fought for?
Did they have to - like you flush the toilet
- because they couldn't get along,
did they have to say,
"Well, we're going back to our homeland and you
Christians can help us"?
I can't understand yet
how the Christians in Europe could have been that dumb
because every theologian,
every history teacher,
knew the things that I'm telling you.
But, they naturally bribed them,
shut them up with money,
stuffed their mouths with money, and now...
I don't care whether you know all this or not.
It doesn't make any difference to me
whether you know all these facts or not,
but it does make a difference to me.
I've got, in my family,
boys that will have to be in the next war,
and I don't want them to go and fight and die...
like they died in Korea.
Like they died in Japan.
Like they've died all over the world. For what?
To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people
who had been in peaceful possession of that land,
those farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of years?
Is that why the United States must go to war?
Because the Democratic Party wants New York State
- the electoral vote?
Illinois, the electoral vote?
And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?...
which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists?...
the balance of power?
In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party,
all Zionists and their co-religionists.
And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes.
Now, I don't blame Mr. Kennedy.
I'm fond of Mr. Kennedy.
I think he's a great man.
I think he can really pull us out of this trouble
if we get the facts to him.
And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate he knows.
He's playing with the enemy.
Like when you go fishing,
you've got to play with the fish.
Let 'em out and pull 'em in.
But knowing Mr. Kennedy's father,
and how well informed he is on this whole subject,
and how close Kennedy is to his father,
I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
But I do think that it is the duty of every mother,
every loyal Christian,
every person that regards the defense of this country as a sacred right,
that they communicate
- not with their congressman,
not with their senator,
but with President Kennedy.
And tell him, "I do not think you should send my boy,
or our boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of America,
and under the flag that you see here,
our red, white and blue,
to fight there to help keep in the hands of these
which they have stolen".
I think everyone should not alone write once,
but keep writing and get your friends to write.
Now, I could go on endlessly,
and tell you these things to support what I have just asked you to do.
But I don't think it's necessary to do that.
You're above the average group in intelligence
and I don't think it's necessary to impress this any more.
But... I want to tell you one more thing.
You talk about...
"Oh, the Jews.
Why the Jews?
Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and the Jews gave us Jesus,
and the Jews gave us our religion".
But do you know that on the day of atonement
that you think is so sacred to them,
that on that day...
and I was one of them!
This is not hearsay.
I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser.
I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement,
you walk into a synagogue,
the very first prayer that you recite,
you stand -
and it's the only prayer for which you stand
- and you repeat three times a short prayer.
The Kol Nidre.
In that prayer,
you enter into an agreement with God Almighty
that any oath, vow, or pledge
that you may make during the next twelve months
- any oath, vow or pledge
that you may take during the next twelve months
shall be null and void.
The oath shall not be an oath;
the vow shall not be a vow;
the pledge shall not be a pledge.
They shall have no force and effect,
and so forth and so on.
And further than that, the Talmud teaches:
- whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge
- remember the Kol Nidre prayer
that you recited on the Day of Atonement,
and that exempts you from fulfilling that".
How much can you depend on their loyalty?
You can depend upon their loyalty as much
as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
And we're going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered,
and for the same reason.
You can't depend upon something as insecure as the leadership
that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge.
Now I could go on and recite many other things to you,
but I would have a little respect for your time,
and you want to really, uh,
get through with all of this.
Tomorrow's going to be a long day.
I want to say one thing.
You ask me... well, you think to yourself:
"well how did this fellow get mixed up in this the way he got mixed up in it."
Well, I opened my mouth in 1945,
and I took big pages in newspapers
and tried to tell the American people what I'm telling you.
And one newspaper after another refused the advertisement.
And when I couldn't find a newspaper to take them
- I paid cash, not credit
- what happened?
My lawyer told me,
"There's an editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take your announcement".
So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley,
and that's how I met him.
somebody told me the lawyer
who introduced me,
who was the son of the Dean of the Methodist Bishop,
"Well, I think he's a little anti-Semitic.
I don't know whether I can get him over here.
So he brought him over to my apartment
and we hit it off wonderfully,
and have since then.
Now, I say this,
and I say it without any qualifications.
I say it without any reservations.
And I say it without any hesitation...
if it wasn't for the work that Mr. Conley McGinley did with "Common Sense"
- he's been sending out from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000 every year
- if it wasn't for the work he's been doing
sending those out for fifteen years now,
we would already be a communist country.
Nobody has done what he did to light fires.
Many of the other active persons in this fight
learned all about if for the first time through "Common Sense".
I have been very active in helping him all I could.
I'm not as flush as I was.
I cannot go on spending the money...
I'm not going to take up a collection.
I see five people getting up to leave. (laughter)
I haven't got the money
that I used to spend.
I used to print a quarter of a million of them
out of my own pocket and send them out.
when I first met him,
had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally.
So I said,
"With what you know and what I know,
we can really do a good job".
So I started printing in outside shops of big newspaper companies,
a quarter of a million, and paid for them.
Well, there's always a bottom to the barrel.
I suppose we've all reached that at times.
I'm not so poor that I can't live without working
and that's what worries the Anti-Defamation League.
I can just get by without going and asking for a job
or getting on the bread line.
But Mr. McGinley is working.
He's sick and he's going at this stronger than ever.
And all I want to say
is that they want to close up "Common Sense"
more than any other single thing in the whole world,
as a death-blow to the fight
Christians are making to survive.
So I just want to tell you this.
All they do is circulate rumors:
"Mr. Benjamin H. Freedman is the wealthy backer of 'Common Sense'."
The reason they do that
is to discourage the people in the United States:
don't send any money to Common Sense.
They don't need it.
The've got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as a backer.
That all has strategy.
They don't want to advertise me
so that people that have real estate or securities to sell
will come and call on me.
They just want people to lay off "Common Sense".
And all I'm telling you is,
I do try to help him,
but I haven't been able to.
And I will be very honest.
One thing I won't do is lie.
In the last year
I've had so much sickness in my family
that I could not give him one dollar.
How he's managed to survive, I don't know.
God alone knows.
And he must be in God's care
because how he's pulled through his sickness
and with his financial troubles,
I don't know.
But that press is working...
and every two weeks
about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of "Common Sense" go out with a new message.
And if that information could be multiplied...
if people that now get it
could buy ten or twenty five,
or fifty, give them around.
Plow that field.
Sow those seeds,
you don't know which will take root,
but for God's sake, this is our last chance.
(Freedman then discusses the importance of people
forgoing unnecessary purchases to 'buy more stuff',
play golf, etc.,
and use the money to keep "Common Sense" going.
He explains that the paper is going in debt;
could be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds,
having spent some $2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the information to the American public and elected officials.
He then asks for questions from the audience.)
All right, I'll comment on that.
This is rather deep,
but you all have a very high degree of intelligence,
so I'm going to make an attempt.
In the time of Bible history,
there was a geographic area known as Judea.
Judea was a province of the Roman Empire.
Now, a person who lived in Judea was known as a Judean,
and in Latin it was Judaeus;
in Greek it was Judaius.
Those are the two words, in Greek and Latin,
for a Judean.
Now, in Latin and Greek
there is no such letter as 'j',
and the first syllable of Judaeus and Judaius starts 'ghu'.
Now, when the Bible was written,
it was first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic...
all those languages.
Never Was the word Jew in any of them
because the word didn't exist.
Judea was the country,
and the people were Judeans,
and Jesus was referred to only as a Judean.
I've seen those early...
the earliest scripts available.
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought
that it was time to translate the Bible into English.
There was no English edition of the Bible
because who the Devil could read?
It was only the educated church people
who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages.
Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English.
But in it,
he had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word
because Judea had passed out of existence.
There was no Judea.
People had long ago forgotten that.
So in the first translation
he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew".
At the time, there was no printing press.
between 1345 and the 17th century,
when the press came into use,
that word passed through so many changes...
I have them all here.
If you want
I can read them to you.
That word 'gyu'
which was in the Wycliffe Bible became...
first it was 'gyu',
(because the 'i' in Latin is pronounced like the 'j'.
Julius Caesar is 'Iul'
because there is no 'j' in Latin)
all in Bibles as time went on.
and then 'ivw',
in the 18th century... 'jew'.
All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius,
and Judaeas in Latin.
Now, there was no such thing as 'Jew',
and any theologian
- I've lectured in maybe 20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country,
and two in Europe
- there was no such word as Jew.
There only was Judea,
and Jesus was a Judean
and the first English use of a word in an English bible to describe him was 'gyu'
A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus,
just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab',
and gasoline 'gas'...
a tendency to short up.
So, in England there were no public schools;
people didn't know how to read;
it looked like a scrambled alphabet
so they made a short word out of it.
for a theologian to say that you can't harm the Jews,
is just ridiculous.
I'd like to know where in the scriptures it says that.
I'd like to know the text.
Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews.
What would you,
as a citizen of the United States,
do to people
who did to you what the so-called Jews
- the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers
- they weren't Jews,
as I just explained to you.
They were Eastern Europeans
who'd been converted to Talmudism.
There was no such thing as Judaism.
Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion
known in Bible history as Torah
No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism.
It didn't exist.
They pulled it out of the air...
a meaningless word.
Just like 'anti-Semitic'.
The Arab is a Semite.
And the Christians talk about people
who don't like Jews
and they call all the Arabs anti-Semites.
The only Semites in the world are the Arabs.
There isn't one Jew who's a Semite.
They're all Turkothean Mongoloids.
The Eastern european Jews.
So, they brainwashed the public,
and if you will invite me to meet this reverend
who told you these things,
I'll convince him
and it'll be one step in the right direction.
I'll go wherever I have to go to meet him.
I can answer that.
First of all,
your first premise is wrong.
Your first premise
that all the Jews are loyal to each other is wrong.
the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest
by so many
that they create the impression
that they are the Jewish 'race';
that they are the Jewish nation;
that they are the Jewish people...
and the Christians swallow it like a cream puff.
But in 1844
the German rabbis called a conference of rabbis
from all over the world
for the purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre
from the Day of Atonement religious ceremony.
In Brunswick, Germany,
where that conference was held in 1844,
there was almost a terrific riot.
A civil war.
The Eastern Europeans said,
"What the hell.
We should give up Kol Nidre?
That gives us our grip on our people.
We give them a franchise
so they can tell the Christians,
'Go to hell.
We'll make any deal you want',
but they don't have to carry it out.
That gives us our grip on our people".
So, they're not so united,
and if you knew the feeling that exists...
Now, I'll also show you from an official document
by the man responsible for...
uh, who baptized this race.
is a paper
that we obtained from the archives of the Zionist organization in New York City,
and in it is the manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm,
who - on behalf of the British Cabinet
- negotiated the deal with these Zionists.
And in here he says
that all the jews in England were against it.
who had been there for years,
[inaudible - probably Sephardim],
who had Portuguese and Spanish and Dutch ancestry...
who were monotheists
and believed in that religious belief.
That was while the Eastern European Jews
were still running around in the heart of Asia
and then came into Europe.
But they had no more to do with them than...
can we talk about a Christian 'race'?
or a Christian religion?...
or are the Christians united?
So the same disunity is among the Jews.
And I'll show you in this same document
that when they went to France
to try and get the French government
to back that Zionist venture,
there was only one Jew in France who was for it.
That was Rothschild,
and they did it because they were interested in the oil and the Suez Canal
You know why?
Because if they don't,
they're decked up.
They come around
and they tell you how much you must give,
and if you don't ... oh, you're anti-Semitic.
Then none of their friends will have anything to do with them,
and they start a smear campaign... and you have got to give.
In New York city, in the garment center,
there are twelve manufacturers in the building.
And when the drive is on to sell Israel Bonds,
the United Jewish Drive,
they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and opposite them,
as you make the amount
they put you down for,
they put a gold star after the name.
Then, the buyers are told,
"When you come into that building to call on someone
and they haven't got a gold star,
tell them that you won't buy from them
until they have the gold star".
I don't know what else you can call it.
Then what do they do?
They tell you it's for 'humanitarian purposes'
and they send maybe $8 billion to Israel,
tax exempt, tax deductible.
So if they hadn't sent that eight billion dollars to Israel,
seven billion of it would have gone into the U.S. Treasury
as income tax.
So what happens?
That seven billion dollars deficit
- that air pocket
- the gullible Christians have to make up.
They put a bigger tax on gasor bread
or corporation tax.
Somebody has to pay the housekeeping expenses for the government.
So why do you let these people send their money over there
to buy guns to drive people out of their ancient homeland?
And you say,
"Oh, well. The poor Jews.
They have no place to go
and they've been persecuted all their lives".
They've never been persecuted for their religion.
And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here
to challenge me.
Never once, in all of history,
have they been persecuted for their religion.
Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England?
King Edward the First
drove them out,
and they never came back
until the Cromwell Revolution
which was financed by the Rothschilds.
For four-hundred years
there wasn't a Jew.
But do you know why they were driven out?
Because in the Christian faith
and the Moslem faith
it's a sin to charge 'rent'
for the use of money.
In other words - what we call interest
is a sin.
the Jews had a monopoly in England
and they charged so much interest,
and when the Lords and Dukes couldn't pay,
And they were creating so much trouble
that the king of England finally made himself their partner,
because when they they came to foreclose,
some of these dukes bumped off the Jews...
So the king finally said
- and this is all in history,
look up Tianson
or Rourke, the History of the Jews in England;
two books you can find in your library.
When the king found out what the trouble was all about,
and how much money they were making,
he declared himself a fifty-percent partner of the money lenders.
Edward the First.
And for many years, one-third of the revenues of the British Treasury
came from the fifty-percent interest in money-lending by the Jews.
But it got worse and worse.
So much worse
that when the Lords and Dukes kept killing the money-lenders,
the King then said,
"I declare myself the heir of all the money-lenders.
If they're killed
you have to pay me,
because I'm his sole heir".
That made so much trouble,
because the King had to go out
and collect the money with an army,
so he told the Jews to get out.
There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out,
and they went across to Ireland,
and that's how Ireland got to be part of the United Kingdom.
When King Edward found out what they were doing,
he decided to take Ireland for himself
before someone else did.
He sent Robert Southgard with a mercenary army
and conquered Ireland.
So, show me one time
where a Jew was persecuted in any country
because of his religion.
It has never happened.
It's always their impact on the political, social,
or economic customs and traditions of the community
in which they settle.
Well, they say most of those things themselves.
It was unnecessary for Benjamin Franklin to say it.
Most of those things they say themselves.
But Benjamin Franklin observed,
and by hearsay understood,
what was happening in Europe.
When Russia, in 920 was formed,
and gradually surrounded the Khazar Kingdom,
and absorbed them,
most of the well-to-do Khazars
fled to Western Europe
and brought with them
the very things to which you object
and I object
and a lot of other people object.
The customs, the habits,
with which they were endowed.
When Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews
because that's the name that they went by,
and when the Christians first heard
that these people
who were fleeing from Russia
- who they were
- that they had practiced this Talmudic faith
- the Christians in Western Europe said,
"They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!"
And Mr. Grutz,
the greatest historian amongst the Jews,
- and he's probably as good an authority on that subject
as there is.
So when Ben Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century,
he already saw the results of what these people had done after they left their homeland.
And every word of it is true...
they say it themselves.
I can give you half a dozen books they've written
in which they say the same thing:
When they have money
they become tyrants.
And when they become defeated,
they become ruthless.
They're only barbarians.
They're the descendants of Asiatic Mongols
and they will do anything to accomplish their purpose.
What right did they have
to take over Russia the way they did?
The Czar had abdicated nine or ten months before that.
There was no need for them...
they were going to have a constitutional monarchy.
But they didn't want that.
When the constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November,
they mowed them all down
and established the Soviet Union.
There was no need for that.
But they thought,
"Now is the time",
and if you will look in the Encyclopedia Britannica
under the word 'Bolshevism',
you'll find the five laws there
that Lenin put down for a successful revolution.
One of them is,
"Wait for the right time,
and then give them everything you've got".
It would pay you to read that.
You'd also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree,
who wrote the article for the Encyclopedia Britannica
states that the Jews conceived and created and cultivated the Communist movement.
And that their energy made them the spearhead of the movement.
Harold Blacktree wrote it
and no one knew more about Communism than he.
And the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25 years has been printing it.
Well, I can't advocate that you do anything that's criminal,
but I can tell you this.
You can start what I call an endless chain.
If you can get your friends to write,
here is the statement:
Mr. Kennedy's office gave me this himself.
who succeeded Mr. Kennedy,
took over his office
- was in his office
- and gave me this.
He delivered this on the 25th, and it says here:
"For release to AM
(that means morning papers),
"Israel is here to stay.
It is a national commitment,
special obligation of the Democratic Party.
The White House must take the lead.
We will act promptly and decisively
against any nation in the Middle East
which attacks its neighbor.
I propose that we make clear to both Israel and the Arab states
our guarantee that we will act with whatever force and speed are necessary
to halt any aggression by any nation".
Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland
[the Arab Palestinians]
Is Mr. Kennedy going to do that?
Suppose three million Mexicans came into Texas
and drove the six million Texans into the deserts of Arizona and New Mexico.
Suppose these Mexicans were slipped in there armed
- the Texans were disarmed
- and one night they drove them all out of Texas
and declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo.
What would the United States say?
Would we say it's aggression
for these Texans to try to get their homes back from the Mexican thieves?
Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly armed by the Soviets
they rose up and drove all the whites into the swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida...
drove them out completely,
and declared themselves the Republic of Ham,
or the Republic of something-or-other.
Would we call it aggression
if these people,
the whites of Alabama,
tried to go back to their homes?
Would we... what would we think
if the soviet Union said,
"No, those Negroes now occupy them!
Leave them there!",
"No, those Mexicans are in Texas.
they declared themselves a sovereign state.
Leave them there.
You have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada.
Settle somewhere else".
Would we call it aggression
if the Alabama whites or the Texans
wanted to go back to their homes?
you've got to write to President Kennedy and say,
"We do not consider it aggression
in the sense that you use the word,
if these people want to return to their homes
as the United Nations
- fifteen times in the last twelve years
- called upon the Zionists in occupation of Palestine
to allow the Arab Palestinians
to return to their former homes and farms".
[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech,
given in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.,
on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time,